<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GoDaddy took down 7,000 sites in the Last 2 years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2008/06/24/godaddy-took-down-7000-sites-in-the-last-2-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/06/24/godaddy-took-down-7000-sites-in-the-last-2-years/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 03:22:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe The Plunger</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/06/24/godaddy-took-down-7000-sites-in-the-last-2-years/comment-page-1/#comment-9210</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe The Plunger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 22:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=709#comment-9210</guid>
		<description>Example of whats next! AARP is going to ICANN to try and get one of my domains AARPDISCOUNTS.com and GoDaddy took the domain out of the control panel before I could sign it over to them or sell or whatever..ALL of this before I was noticed from AARP lawyers. They did however keep the forward and DNS pointing to my website</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Example of whats next! AARP is going to ICANN to try and get one of my domains AARPDISCOUNTS.com and GoDaddy took the domain out of the control panel before I could sign it over to them or sell or whatever..ALL of this before I was noticed from AARP lawyers. They did however keep the forward and DNS pointing to my website</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Choices: Targeted Traffic Award Nominations - Domainly</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/06/24/godaddy-took-down-7000-sites-in-the-last-2-years/comment-page-1/#comment-7295</link>
		<dc:creator>My Choices: Targeted Traffic Award Nominations - Domainly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=709#comment-7295</guid>
		<description>[...] his blog, from auction ethics, standing strong behind the ICA, to discussing many issues no other domainer would talk [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] his blog, from auction ethics, standing strong behind the ICA, to discussing many issues no other domainer would talk [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Choices: Targeted Traffic Award Nominations at Conceptualist.com, By Sahar Sarid</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/06/24/godaddy-took-down-7000-sites-in-the-last-2-years/comment-page-1/#comment-7290</link>
		<dc:creator>My Choices: Targeted Traffic Award Nominations at Conceptualist.com, By Sahar Sarid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=709#comment-7290</guid>
		<description>[...] his blog, from auction ethics, standing strong behind the ICA, to discussing many issues no other domainer would talk [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] his blog, from auction ethics, standing strong behind the ICA, to discussing many issues no other domainer would talk [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/06/24/godaddy-took-down-7000-sites-in-the-last-2-years/comment-page-1/#comment-6136</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=709#comment-6136</guid>
		<description>Damir

Exactly

And which type of sites is next on the list?

Maybe one of  your&#039;s or mine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damir</p>
<p>Exactly</p>
<p>And which type of sites is next on the list?</p>
<p>Maybe one of  your&#8217;s or mine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damir</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/06/24/godaddy-took-down-7000-sites-in-the-last-2-years/comment-page-1/#comment-6125</link>
		<dc:creator>Damir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=709#comment-6125</guid>
		<description>Great post - It’s very scary that a registrar can take it upon itself to enforce a non-existent law against a large number of sites, while letting more obvious but possibly more profitable infractions go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post &#8211; It’s very scary that a registrar can take it upon itself to enforce a non-existent law against a large number of sites, while letting more obvious but possibly more profitable infractions go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/06/24/godaddy-took-down-7000-sites-in-the-last-2-years/comment-page-1/#comment-6074</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=709#comment-6074</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t be too worried about GoDaddy&#039;s support of this, as I think they&#039;re just trying to CYA.  I wrote about this issue a while back (in regards to GoDaddy spending money lobbying pharmacy issues) and surmised:

&quot;I suspect the company was lobbying to make sure there weren’t provisions in the bill that forced domain registrars to take specific actions without a valid complaint. Registars want to be allowed to respond to requests without facing liability, but also don’t want the burden to be placed on them to police registrations — and for good reason.&quot;

http://domainnamewire.com/2008/04/03/why-godaddy-spent-lobbying-money-on-pharmacy-issues/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be too worried about GoDaddy&#8217;s support of this, as I think they&#8217;re just trying to CYA.  I wrote about this issue a while back (in regards to GoDaddy spending money lobbying pharmacy issues) and surmised:</p>
<p>&#8220;I suspect the company was lobbying to make sure there weren’t provisions in the bill that forced domain registrars to take specific actions without a valid complaint. Registars want to be allowed to respond to requests without facing liability, but also don’t want the burden to be placed on them to police registrations — and for good reason.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://domainnamewire.com/2008/04/03/why-godaddy-spent-lobbying-money-on-pharmacy-issues/" rel="nofollow">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/04/03/why-godaddy-spent-lobbying-money-on-pharmacy-issues/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Too Many Secrets</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/06/24/godaddy-took-down-7000-sites-in-the-last-2-years/comment-page-1/#comment-6070</link>
		<dc:creator>Too Many Secrets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=709#comment-6070</guid>
		<description>@Michael

Great post, thank you for bringing this to our attention.

@Owen

Good point, where is that site, the same place you can buy speed and weed too?  I am sure someone will say there is one site or forum out there that you can get this stuff with the right secret handshake, and reference from your friend Timmy, but are the kids really at risk to one-offs like this?

- Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Michael</p>
<p>Great post, thank you for bringing this to our attention.</p>
<p>@Owen</p>
<p>Good point, where is that site, the same place you can buy speed and weed too?  I am sure someone will say there is one site or forum out there that you can get this stuff with the right secret handshake, and reference from your friend Timmy, but are the kids really at risk to one-offs like this?</p>
<p>- Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: owen frager</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/06/24/godaddy-took-down-7000-sites-in-the-last-2-years/comment-page-1/#comment-6063</link>
		<dc:creator>owen frager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 04:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=709#comment-6063</guid>
		<description>Please tell me where you can buy  ecstasy online?
More important, where can I sign up for the affiliate program?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please tell me where you can buy  ecstasy online?<br />
More important, where can I sign up for the affiliate program?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/06/24/godaddy-took-down-7000-sites-in-the-last-2-years/comment-page-1/#comment-6060</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 03:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=709#comment-6060</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s very scary that a registrar can take it upon itself to enforce a non-existent law against a large number of sites, while letting more obvious but possibly more profitable infractions go.

The statement regarding the sale of ecstasy seems to be one made to inflame congress into passing yet another law.

The sale of ecstasy is already clearly illegal whether done in person or on the internet.

I have gotten thousands of e-mails advertising prescription drugs  for sale on the net.

However I have never seen or even heard of ecstasy for sale.  Is the Counsel for Godaddy saying that these 7,000 sites sold Ecstasy??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s very scary that a registrar can take it upon itself to enforce a non-existent law against a large number of sites, while letting more obvious but possibly more profitable infractions go.</p>
<p>The statement regarding the sale of ecstasy seems to be one made to inflame congress into passing yet another law.</p>
<p>The sale of ecstasy is already clearly illegal whether done in person or on the internet.</p>
<p>I have gotten thousands of e-mails advertising prescription drugs  for sale on the net.</p>
<p>However I have never seen or even heard of ecstasy for sale.  Is the Counsel for Godaddy saying that these 7,000 sites sold Ecstasy??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve M</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/06/24/godaddy-took-down-7000-sites-in-the-last-2-years/comment-page-1/#comment-6059</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 03:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=709#comment-6059</guid>
		<description>I think they call it moral relativism, Michael.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they call it moral relativism, Michael.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
