<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tucows.com Ending In House Drop Auction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/27/tucowscom-ending-in-house-drop-auction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/27/tucowscom-ending-in-house-drop-auction/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:56:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Damir</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/27/tucowscom-ending-in-house-drop-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-5401</link>
		<dc:creator>Damir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 14:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=618#comment-5401</guid>
		<description>Great post and response to it.

Although they have been retaining “the best” of their domains, “the Best” is in the eye of the beholder,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post and response to it.</p>
<p>Although they have been retaining “the best” of their domains, “the Best” is in the eye of the beholder,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tucows Ends In-House Drop Auction &#187; Domain News</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/27/tucowscom-ending-in-house-drop-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-5380</link>
		<dc:creator>Tucows Ends In-House Drop Auction &#187; Domain News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 20:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=618#comment-5380</guid>
		<description>[...] Tucows, a wholesale domain registrar, has decided to end its in-house drop auctions for expired domains as reported by The Domains. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tucows, a wholesale domain registrar, has decided to end its in-house drop auctions for expired domains as reported by The Domains. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tucows Ends In-House Drop Auction &#124; Domain Name News</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/27/tucowscom-ending-in-house-drop-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-5379</link>
		<dc:creator>Tucows Ends In-House Drop Auction &#124; Domain Name News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 20:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=618#comment-5379</guid>
		<description>[...] Tucows, a wholesale domain registrar, has decided to end its in-house drop auctions for expired domains as reported by The Domains. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tucows, a wholesale domain registrar, has decided to end its in-house drop auctions for expired domains as reported by The Domains. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/27/tucowscom-ending-in-house-drop-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-5377</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 16:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=618#comment-5377</guid>
		<description>Interesting - I actually did not know tucows had an auction system.  Fully agree that the smaller, under 5k lists are the easiest to scan and are easy to do daily.  NameJet and Snapnames seem almost impossible.  Maybe that is the new value though...just get it done.

Your points on the value being in the scanner and what they are looking for and value is so true.  In fact, it is so funny how someone can view our collection as many subpar domains I think are excellent and I see many many complete portfolios that I would not even touch for 1-yr reg fees.  Then I love to see the marketing spin put on how great these names are in an effort to justify their worth.

Everyday, this biz makes me smile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting &#8211; I actually did not know tucows had an auction system.  Fully agree that the smaller, under 5k lists are the easiest to scan and are easy to do daily.  NameJet and Snapnames seem almost impossible.  Maybe that is the new value though&#8230;just get it done.</p>
<p>Your points on the value being in the scanner and what they are looking for and value is so true.  In fact, it is so funny how someone can view our collection as many subpar domains I think are excellent and I see many many complete portfolios that I would not even touch for 1-yr reg fees.  Then I love to see the marketing spin put on how great these names are in an effort to justify their worth.</p>
<p>Everyday, this biz makes me smile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/27/tucowscom-ending-in-house-drop-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-5375</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 15:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=618#comment-5375</guid>
		<description>Jamie

Although they have been retaining &quot;the best&quot; of their domains, &quot;the Best&quot; is in the eye of the beholder, so some decent names have been getting released into their auction system.

They also do not retain any adult domains to the best of my knowledge.

Your not going to find too many five figure domains, but there have definately been some in the last couple of years, copying.com is one that comes to mind that they did not retain.

There are also many domains we believe are worth several thousands of dollars retail, that were sold for $60 and above on a regular basis.

Once again each of us can look through a list of domains and see ones we like that others dont&#039;.

For example I don&#039;t see buying the LLLL.com names but everyday i see bids on them at namejet.com
To me their junk but to other&#039;s their gold.

Likewise whomever looks over the list for tucows has their own outlook and just because the release a name it doesn&#039;t mean its crap,

However these are not names that will stand out when mixed with 30,000 other daily dropping domains.

So my belief is that Tucows.com may actually receive less revenue, using one of the other auction houses than they receive now, especially after they have to split the proceeds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jamie</p>
<p>Although they have been retaining &#8220;the best&#8221; of their domains, &#8220;the Best&#8221; is in the eye of the beholder, so some decent names have been getting released into their auction system.</p>
<p>They also do not retain any adult domains to the best of my knowledge.</p>
<p>Your not going to find too many five figure domains, but there have definately been some in the last couple of years, copying.com is one that comes to mind that they did not retain.</p>
<p>There are also many domains we believe are worth several thousands of dollars retail, that were sold for $60 and above on a regular basis.</p>
<p>Once again each of us can look through a list of domains and see ones we like that others dont&#8217;.</p>
<p>For example I don&#8217;t see buying the LLLL.com names but everyday i see bids on them at namejet.com<br />
To me their junk but to other&#8217;s their gold.</p>
<p>Likewise whomever looks over the list for tucows has their own outlook and just because the release a name it doesn&#8217;t mean its crap,</p>
<p>However these are not names that will stand out when mixed with 30,000 other daily dropping domains.</p>
<p>So my belief is that Tucows.com may actually receive less revenue, using one of the other auction houses than they receive now, especially after they have to split the proceeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/27/tucowscom-ending-in-house-drop-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-5374</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 15:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=618#comment-5374</guid>
		<description>&quot;Tucows.com had been retaining an unknown portion of it own expired domains, then placing the rest through its own auction system.&quot;

This would be the part I am interested in to see if it changes. If Tucows keeps all the good ones, I guess it wouldn&#039;t matter where they send their domains to auction. We already know they keep the best of the best and dump the rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Tucows.com had been retaining an unknown portion of it own expired domains, then placing the rest through its own auction system.&#8221;</p>
<p>This would be the part I am interested in to see if it changes. If Tucows keeps all the good ones, I guess it wouldn&#8217;t matter where they send their domains to auction. We already know they keep the best of the best and dump the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Tucows.com Ending In House Drop Auction Available Domains:</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/27/tucowscom-ending-in-house-drop-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-5372</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Tucows.com Ending In House Drop Auction Available Domains:</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=618#comment-5372</guid>
		<description>[...] Here is the original post: Tucows.com Ending In House Drop Auction [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here is the original post: Tucows.com Ending In House Drop Auction [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
