<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Trend: Naming your baby based on the avalibility of the .com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/24/new-trend-naming-your-baby-based-on-the-avalibility-of-the-com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/24/new-trend-naming-your-baby-based-on-the-avalibility-of-the-com/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mountaingoat</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/24/new-trend-naming-your-baby-based-on-the-avalibility-of-the-com/comment-page-1/#comment-5366</link>
		<dc:creator>mountaingoat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 03:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=607#comment-5366</guid>
		<description>Mr. Berkens - 

Thank you. 

I have another question for you, if I may.....this time further off topic from the initial post.  Most Wanted Domains has a couple hundred spanish names in its inventory. Do you have a similar, very general x% rule of thumb for spanish name values, compared to english names, such as casa.com vs house.com? I&#039;ve done a little comps searching, but I didn&#039;t uncover any direct comparisons. (For kicks, I used estibot to compare 20 random, common terms in spanish vs english. The results ranged from 2% to 33%, with an average around 10%, which seems quite high to me.)

From a newbie, thanks for your great blog and insights into the domain world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Berkens &#8211; </p>
<p>Thank you. </p>
<p>I have another question for you, if I may&#8230;..this time further off topic from the initial post.  Most Wanted Domains has a couple hundred spanish names in its inventory. Do you have a similar, very general x% rule of thumb for spanish name values, compared to english names, such as casa.com vs house.com? I&#8217;ve done a little comps searching, but I didn&#8217;t uncover any direct comparisons. (For kicks, I used estibot to compare 20 random, common terms in spanish vs english. The results ranged from 2% to 33%, with an average around 10%, which seems quite high to me.)</p>
<p>From a newbie, thanks for your great blog and insights into the domain world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/24/new-trend-naming-your-baby-based-on-the-avalibility-of-the-com/comment-page-1/#comment-5362</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 00:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=607#comment-5362</guid>
		<description>Mountain

In general it our opinion that a .net is worth no more than 5% of a .com but that is only if its a great name.

Look at sex.com 12M, sex.net 425K, porn.com 9,5M porn.net 400K both sold in the same year.

However once you get beyond great .com&#039;s, the 5% rule will shrink fast</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mountain</p>
<p>In general it our opinion that a .net is worth no more than 5% of a .com but that is only if its a great name.</p>
<p>Look at sex.com 12M, sex.net 425K, porn.com 9,5M porn.net 400K both sold in the same year.</p>
<p>However once you get beyond great .com&#8217;s, the 5% rule will shrink fast</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mountaingoat</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/24/new-trend-naming-your-baby-based-on-the-avalibility-of-the-com/comment-page-1/#comment-5360</link>
		<dc:creator>mountaingoat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 16:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=607#comment-5360</guid>
		<description>Somewhat related question: do you have a personal rule of thumb for comparing the value of a .net name to a .com first name. For example. Susan.com sells for $50k, then the .net is worth x-y% of that (5-10%, or $2.5k-5k)? Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somewhat related question: do you have a personal rule of thumb for comparing the value of a .net name to a .com first name. For example. Susan.com sells for $50k, then the .net is worth x-y% of that (5-10%, or $2.5k-5k)? Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/24/new-trend-naming-your-baby-based-on-the-avalibility-of-the-com/comment-page-1/#comment-5297</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 04:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=607#comment-5297</guid>
		<description>Conor

I think Gwyneth Paltrow tried something like that a few years ago, until she realized that apple.com was taken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conor</p>
<p>I think Gwyneth Paltrow tried something like that a few years ago, until she realized that apple.com was taken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conor Neu</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/24/new-trend-naming-your-baby-based-on-the-avalibility-of-the-com/comment-page-1/#comment-5296</link>
		<dc:creator>Conor Neu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 02:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=607#comment-5296</guid>
		<description>What about doing the opposite, buying a top domain name and naming your child after that?

I see a next generation kids running around named SevenMile.com, Cowboys.com, and Pizza.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about doing the opposite, buying a top domain name and naming your child after that?</p>
<p>I see a next generation kids running around named SevenMile.com, Cowboys.com, and Pizza.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toonz</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/24/new-trend-naming-your-baby-based-on-the-avalibility-of-the-com/comment-page-1/#comment-5089</link>
		<dc:creator>Toonz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 03:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=607#comment-5089</guid>
		<description>I regged both of my kids&#039; names when they were born... FirstLast.com  

Whoever does not do that won&#039;t be able to soon, if they even still could now.  I tried to register a few for a friend of mine&#039;s kids but had to use a middle intitial for one kid - and they both had unusual first names.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I regged both of my kids&#8217; names when they were born&#8230; FirstLast.com  </p>
<p>Whoever does not do that won&#8217;t be able to soon, if they even still could now.  I tried to register a few for a friend of mine&#8217;s kids but had to use a middle intitial for one kid &#8211; and they both had unusual first names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David J Castello</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/24/new-trend-naming-your-baby-based-on-the-avalibility-of-the-com/comment-page-1/#comment-4994</link>
		<dc:creator>David J Castello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 19:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=607#comment-4994</guid>
		<description>Way back when, my brother bought Jonathan.com for his son who is now 15 and has built a popular blog with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way back when, my brother bought Jonathan.com for his son who is now 15 and has built a popular blog with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damir</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/24/new-trend-naming-your-baby-based-on-the-avalibility-of-the-com/comment-page-1/#comment-4974</link>
		<dc:creator>Damir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 17:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=607#comment-4974</guid>
		<description>Great post - it is for sure a clever way to make money = domain name + Baby Name</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post &#8211; it is for sure a clever way to make money = domain name + Baby Name</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; New Trend: Naming your baby based on the avalibility of the .com Available Domains:</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/24/new-trend-naming-your-baby-based-on-the-avalibility-of-the-com/comment-page-1/#comment-4972</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; New Trend: Naming your baby based on the avalibility of the .com Available Domains:</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 17:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=607#comment-4972</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post: New Trend: Naming your baby based on the avalibility of the .com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post: New Trend: Naming your baby based on the avalibility of the .com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/24/new-trend-naming-your-baby-based-on-the-avalibility-of-the-com/comment-page-1/#comment-4956</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 16:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=607#comment-4956</guid>
		<description>We registered berkens.com years ago and I got to tell you when you give someone your e-mail address its pretty cool and  memorable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We registered berkens.com years ago and I got to tell you when you give someone your e-mail address its pretty cool and  memorable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

