<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Domains containing Keywords Important in Search Engine Rankings??</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/24/are-domains-containing-keywords-important-in-search-engine-rankings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/24/are-domains-containing-keywords-important-in-search-engine-rankings/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/24/are-domains-containing-keywords-important-in-search-engine-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-5194</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 14:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=606#comment-5194</guid>
		<description>KW + age does matter on GOOG.  KW + New Reg does not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KW + age does matter on GOOG.  KW + New Reg does not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/24/are-domains-containing-keywords-important-in-search-engine-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-5062</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 23:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=606#comment-5062</guid>
		<description>I agree with the post...I have a two month old blog where the domain name is an exact match and MSN is my highest stat in my hosting stats  by far...and even though goog may not give the domain much credit, a reader will</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the post&#8230;I have a two month old blog where the domain name is an exact match and MSN is my highest stat in my hosting stats  by far&#8230;and even though goog may not give the domain much credit, a reader will</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sell Domains</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/24/are-domains-containing-keywords-important-in-search-engine-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-5049</link>
		<dc:creator>Sell Domains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 22:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=606#comment-5049</guid>
		<description>From my personal experience I disagree.  Although I don&#039;t think it is a huge factor I know from experience it helps.  In a very short period of time I&#039;ve been able to rank #1 for rather high for moderately competitive keywords.   

Additionally, it really helps with trust and branding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From my personal experience I disagree.  Although I don&#8217;t think it is a huge factor I know from experience it helps.  In a very short period of time I&#8217;ve been able to rank #1 for rather high for moderately competitive keywords.   </p>
<p>Additionally, it really helps with trust and branding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seyi</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/24/are-domains-containing-keywords-important-in-search-engine-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-4984</link>
		<dc:creator>Seyi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 18:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=606#comment-4984</guid>
		<description>I think this explains the reason why Google is better at &quot;search engineering&quot; than MSN and Yahoo. I mean what is the point of ranking high a ‘useless’ web site with ‘’good keywords’ with no good content or service. No wonder most people prefer using Google</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this explains the reason why Google is better at &#8220;search engineering&#8221; than MSN and Yahoo. I mean what is the point of ranking high a ‘useless’ web site with ‘’good keywords’ with no good content or service. No wonder most people prefer using Google</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damir</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/24/are-domains-containing-keywords-important-in-search-engine-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-4975</link>
		<dc:creator>Damir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 17:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=606#comment-4975</guid>
		<description>Nice One you are spot on:

The basic conclusion is that in Google not so much.
In Yahoo somewhat more and in Microsoft Live Search, Yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice One you are spot on:</p>
<p>The basic conclusion is that in Google not so much.<br />
In Yahoo somewhat more and in Microsoft Live Search, Yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Are Domains containing Keywords Important in Search Engine Rankings?? Available Domains:</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/24/are-domains-containing-keywords-important-in-search-engine-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-4947</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Are Domains containing Keywords Important in Search Engine Rankings?? Available Domains:</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 16:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=606#comment-4947</guid>
		<description>[...] See original here: Are Domains containing Keywords Important in Search Engine Rankings?? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See original here: Are Domains containing Keywords Important in Search Engine Rankings?? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

