<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Should Microsoft Do With That $46 Billion?:  How About Buy Domains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/13/what-should-microsoft-do-with-that-46-billion-how-about-buy-domains/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/13/what-should-microsoft-do-with-that-46-billion-how-about-buy-domains/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Vision 2010 and Beyond, Part I &#124; NameTalent.com &#8211; Domain Name Publication &#8211; Consulting, Brokerage and Domains for Sale</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/13/what-should-microsoft-do-with-that-46-billion-how-about-buy-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-22253</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Vision 2010 and Beyond, Part I &#124; NameTalent.com &#8211; Domain Name Publication &#8211; Consulting, Brokerage and Domains for Sale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=546#comment-22253</guid>
		<description>[...] Year Michael Berken&#8217;s (who originally spawned the Microsoft domain buyout idea in his 2008 post) actually got to spend some time making the pitch he had been dreaming about to the Senior [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Year Michael Berken&#8217;s (who originally spawned the Microsoft domain buyout idea in his 2008 post) actually got to spend some time making the pitch he had been dreaming about to the Senior [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/13/what-should-microsoft-do-with-that-46-billion-how-about-buy-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-3991</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 15:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=546#comment-3991</guid>
		<description>Michael

I don&#039;t think a public company would spend billions of dollars for fractional domain interests.

The 5B they could spend would net them several public companies, at least one looking to go public and many of the top privately owned portfolios, free and clear with all traffic pointed to MSN and all revenue derived staying in house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think a public company would spend billions of dollars for fractional domain interests.</p>
<p>The 5B they could spend would net them several public companies, at least one looking to go public and many of the top privately owned portfolios, free and clear with all traffic pointed to MSN and all revenue derived staying in house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Castello</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/13/what-should-microsoft-do-with-that-46-billion-how-about-buy-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-3978</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Castello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 05:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=546#comment-3978</guid>
		<description>Microsoft should simply spend 5 billion fractionalizing with the best domain portfolios. That is their forte. They do not want the burden of building out each of the internet’s best names but would surely want a piece of those that are doing it. MS needs to start partnering with the domain industry in strategic ways. I believe someone there must be considering it. They are too smart to be dropping that ball. I would hate to think they would stall out like IBM did 20 years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft should simply spend 5 billion fractionalizing with the best domain portfolios. That is their forte. They do not want the burden of building out each of the internet’s best names but would surely want a piece of those that are doing it. MS needs to start partnering with the domain industry in strategic ways. I believe someone there must be considering it. They are too smart to be dropping that ball. I would hate to think they would stall out like IBM did 20 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/13/what-should-microsoft-do-with-that-46-billion-how-about-buy-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-3976</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 04:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=546#comment-3976</guid>
		<description>Yes it is a strategy but it is also war. 

BTW, I&#039;m not trying to start a war on your blog :)

I&#039;m with you, I want to see a  major network come knocking on a domainers door, but I believe it would start a war just like Google&#039;s Purchase of DoubleClick did.  What followed were multiple ad network buyouts by MSFT, and Yahoo.

I, like yourself believe a domain portfolio or 2 or 3 would be a great investment for MSFT, YHOO, or GOOG; however I do not see it happening.  With all the consolidation in this industry it is still relatively fragmented.  By this I mean no one company or individual has enough market share.  Please correct me if I am wrong, I would love to see some stats.

I also believe that some of the bigger companies are flat out not interested in selling for different reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes it is a strategy but it is also war. </p>
<p>BTW, I&#8217;m not trying to start a war on your blog <img src='http://www.thedomains.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;m with you, I want to see a  major network come knocking on a domainers door, but I believe it would start a war just like Google&#8217;s Purchase of DoubleClick did.  What followed were multiple ad network buyouts by MSFT, and Yahoo.</p>
<p>I, like yourself believe a domain portfolio or 2 or 3 would be a great investment for MSFT, YHOO, or GOOG; however I do not see it happening.  With all the consolidation in this industry it is still relatively fragmented.  By this I mean no one company or individual has enough market share.  Please correct me if I am wrong, I would love to see some stats.</p>
<p>I also believe that some of the bigger companies are flat out not interested in selling for different reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve M</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/13/what-should-microsoft-do-with-that-46-billion-how-about-buy-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-3970</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=546#comment-3970</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an excellent idea (though I&#039;d be shocked if they did it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an excellent idea (though I&#8217;d be shocked if they did it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: owen frager</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/13/what-should-microsoft-do-with-that-46-billion-how-about-buy-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-3967</link>
		<dc:creator>owen frager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 19:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=546#comment-3967</guid>
		<description>I was close it&#039;s Kudlow &amp; Company:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=739435461&amp;play=1

Online they only show part of the show- not sure if the Yahoo discussion is included</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was close it&#8217;s Kudlow &amp; Company:<br />
<a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=739435461&#038;play=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=739435461&#038;play=1</a></p>
<p>Online they only show part of the show- not sure if the Yahoo discussion is included</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/13/what-should-microsoft-do-with-that-46-billion-how-about-buy-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-3966</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 19:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=546#comment-3966</guid>
		<description>Owen

Not familiar with the Ludlow report

You have a link to it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Owen</p>
<p>Not familiar with the Ludlow report</p>
<p>You have a link to it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: owen frager</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/13/what-should-microsoft-do-with-that-46-billion-how-about-buy-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-3965</link>
		<dc:creator>owen frager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 19:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=546#comment-3965</guid>
		<description>This was actually covered by Steve Forbes and a panel on the Ludlow report yesterday.

Noted: the key difference is that Yahoo has relationships and domainers have ships passing in the night. Each email address is worth $30, plus the beauty of Yahoo to MS was not just traffic but people hooked on the sports and other channels who may stay even if only billed $2.5o a month. People who will be pre-disposed to buy software as a service when operating systems are more web-based.

Remember buying Yahoo you put up banners and make a lot more then hoping for click-troughs or having to justify the fraud etc. It&#039;s like putting newspapers in front of hotel doors and calling it bonus circulation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was actually covered by Steve Forbes and a panel on the Ludlow report yesterday.</p>
<p>Noted: the key difference is that Yahoo has relationships and domainers have ships passing in the night. Each email address is worth $30, plus the beauty of Yahoo to MS was not just traffic but people hooked on the sports and other channels who may stay even if only billed $2.5o a month. People who will be pre-disposed to buy software as a service when operating systems are more web-based.</p>
<p>Remember buying Yahoo you put up banners and make a lot more then hoping for click-troughs or having to justify the fraud etc. It&#8217;s like putting newspapers in front of hotel doors and calling it bonus circulation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/13/what-should-microsoft-do-with-that-46-billion-how-about-buy-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-3964</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 19:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=546#comment-3964</guid>
		<description>Ed

It’s not a war.

It&#039;s a strategy whereby MSFT can take away traffic from Yahoo and Google permanently and put it in its own network.  I think 10%-15% swing for 5 Billion is very possible.

If MSFT comes correct to domainers offering stock and cash, they could get it done and be much further ahead of where they sit right now with 5% of the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed</p>
<p>It’s not a war.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a strategy whereby MSFT can take away traffic from Yahoo and Google permanently and put it in its own network.  I think 10%-15% swing for 5 Billion is very possible.</p>
<p>If MSFT comes correct to domainers offering stock and cash, they could get it done and be much further ahead of where they sit right now with 5% of the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/05/13/what-should-microsoft-do-with-that-46-billion-how-about-buy-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-3963</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 18:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=546#comment-3963</guid>
		<description>Guys

No one is suggesting that MSFT spend 46 billion.

I think they could do the 10% swing for 5B.

They would stay way clear of any TM and I assume adult and gambling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys</p>
<p>No one is suggesting that MSFT spend 46 billion.</p>
<p>I think they could do the 10% swing for 5B.</p>
<p>They would stay way clear of any TM and I assume adult and gambling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

