<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo Unveils OneSearch 2.0 for Mobile Phones with Voice Search; Are .mobi in trouble??</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2008/04/02/yahoo-unveils-onesearch-20-for-mobile-phones-with-voice-search-are-mobi-in-trouble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/04/02/yahoo-unveils-onesearch-20-for-mobile-phones-with-voice-search-are-mobi-in-trouble/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BG</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/04/02/yahoo-unveils-onesearch-20-for-mobile-phones-with-voice-search-are-mobi-in-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-21223</link>
		<dc:creator>BG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 03:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/2008/04/02/yahoo-unveils-onesearch-20-for-mobile-phones-with-voice-search-are-mobi-in-trouble/#comment-21223</guid>
		<description>Ha, a guy fight. You gents make me chuckle. Strong opinions on both sides of the fence. 

Who says everybody doesn&#039;t use an iPhone? Lol.  Six months after these posts it&#039;s a different ballgame. 

Tonight us the first time I&#039;ve ever read domainer blogs but I had already decided, personally, I didn&#039;t like .mobi as an extension. However, the word itself I like a LOT, it&#039;s a very cute/cool word &amp; fun to use to create email names and domains but by incorporating the word itself into a regular .com name which let&#039;s you use it at the beginning or the end.

I also Love my iPhone &amp; have used the iBook only one time since I got the iPhone in July.    

Forget .info .biz etc. I guess I&#039;m from the old .com school.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, a guy fight. You gents make me chuckle. Strong opinions on both sides of the fence. </p>
<p>Who says everybody doesn&#8217;t use an iPhone? Lol.  Six months after these posts it&#8217;s a different ballgame. </p>
<p>Tonight us the first time I&#8217;ve ever read domainer blogs but I had already decided, personally, I didn&#8217;t like .mobi as an extension. However, the word itself I like a LOT, it&#8217;s a very cute/cool word &amp; fun to use to create email names and domains but by incorporating the word itself into a regular .com name which let&#8217;s you use it at the beginning or the end.</p>
<p>I also Love my iPhone &amp; have used the iBook only one time since I got the iPhone in July.    </p>
<p>Forget .info .biz etc. I guess I&#8217;m from the old .com school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerry</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/04/02/yahoo-unveils-onesearch-20-for-mobile-phones-with-voice-search-are-mobi-in-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-12897</link>
		<dc:creator>gerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/2008/04/02/yahoo-unveils-onesearch-20-for-mobile-phones-with-voice-search-are-mobi-in-trouble/#comment-12897</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know...call me dumb.

Seems to me the ones that really lose are the ones that YET AGAIN have found the final nail for .mobi&#039;s coffin.

It would be interesting to know, although I could personally care less, how many domainers have pronounced .mobi dying or dead by, DAMMIT! It still exists.

If one was to look back through your own blog (again, I really don&#039;t care) since the release of .mobi, how many clips will seem similar to this headline - yet another death of .mobi.

Thank God for the new gTLD&#039;s in the fire. 

Perhaps domainers and bloggers will finally get it right - someone MUST die. Some domain extension MUST die. 

Why? Because we don&#039;t like it. 

(We, being the miniature sect of a global population discussing domain names to begin with of which perhaps 1/10 of 1% of domainers even read this thread).

Domainers don&#039;t control the internet.

They just wish they did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know&#8230;call me dumb.</p>
<p>Seems to me the ones that really lose are the ones that YET AGAIN have found the final nail for .mobi&#8217;s coffin.</p>
<p>It would be interesting to know, although I could personally care less, how many domainers have pronounced .mobi dying or dead by, DAMMIT! It still exists.</p>
<p>If one was to look back through your own blog (again, I really don&#8217;t care) since the release of .mobi, how many clips will seem similar to this headline &#8211; yet another death of .mobi.</p>
<p>Thank God for the new gTLD&#8217;s in the fire. </p>
<p>Perhaps domainers and bloggers will finally get it right &#8211; someone MUST die. Some domain extension MUST die. </p>
<p>Why? Because we don&#8217;t like it. </p>
<p>(We, being the miniature sect of a global population discussing domain names to begin with of which perhaps 1/10 of 1% of domainers even read this thread).</p>
<p>Domainers don&#8217;t control the internet.</p>
<p>They just wish they did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MobiSite</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/04/02/yahoo-unveils-onesearch-20-for-mobile-phones-with-voice-search-are-mobi-in-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-12895</link>
		<dc:creator>MobiSite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/2008/04/02/yahoo-unveils-onesearch-20-for-mobile-phones-with-voice-search-are-mobi-in-trouble/#comment-12895</guid>
		<description>couple of glaring errors in &#039;article&#039;
firstly the majority of people suring mobile internet dont use iphones. not in march 2008 and not now
the developing world is huge. have you heard?
do some research
second point, porn.mobi was not bought by a domainer. it was bought by a big player in the adult industry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>couple of glaring errors in &#8216;article&#8217;<br />
firstly the majority of people suring mobile internet dont use iphones. not in march 2008 and not now<br />
the developing world is huge. have you heard?<br />
do some research<br />
second point, porn.mobi was not bought by a domainer. it was bought by a big player in the adult industry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/04/02/yahoo-unveils-onesearch-20-for-mobile-phones-with-voice-search-are-mobi-in-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-11690</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 12:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/2008/04/02/yahoo-unveils-onesearch-20-for-mobile-phones-with-voice-search-are-mobi-in-trouble/#comment-11690</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad to see that Pinky, Vance et al didn&#039;t rise to the bait.... you guys are, as you freely admit - very biased.. you also have stand to suffer financially when dotmobi takes away business from your established domain name portfolio so I have to say well done to mTLD for having the good judgement to say their piece and then leave without getting drawn in to some cheap exchange of &#039;skewed&#039; views.

A TLD is a TLD at the end of the day... and I don&#039;t see you getting so worked up about dotbiz or dot.info domains - because you don&#039;t see those as threatening to your cozy position up top...  

It is clear from all domain blogs that dotmobi rattles the established domain community... which speaks volumes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad to see that Pinky, Vance et al didn&#8217;t rise to the bait&#8230;. you guys are, as you freely admit &#8211; very biased.. you also have stand to suffer financially when dotmobi takes away business from your established domain name portfolio so I have to say well done to mTLD for having the good judgement to say their piece and then leave without getting drawn in to some cheap exchange of &#8216;skewed&#8217; views.</p>
<p>A TLD is a TLD at the end of the day&#8230; and I don&#8217;t see you getting so worked up about dotbiz or dot.info domains &#8211; because you don&#8217;t see those as threatening to your cozy position up top&#8230;  </p>
<p>It is clear from all domain blogs that dotmobi rattles the established domain community&#8230; which speaks volumes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/04/02/yahoo-unveils-onesearch-20-for-mobile-phones-with-voice-search-are-mobi-in-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-2600</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 13:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/2008/04/02/yahoo-unveils-onesearch-20-for-mobile-phones-with-voice-search-are-mobi-in-trouble/#comment-2600</guid>
		<description>Update

Just read a story today, Google in fact did bid for the  recent government spectrum auction for Wireless services, however they were simply outbid by Verizon 

In a post on the company&#039;s blog, Google attorney Richard Whitt wrote that, &quot;for many days during the early course of the auction, we were the high bidder&quot; for the so-called &quot;C block&quot; of spectrum.

That block had rules attached to it that would open it up to a broader array of devices and applications than those provided directly by the spectrum&#039;s owner, but only if bidding reached $4.6 billion.

&quot;But it was clear, then and now, that Verizon Wireless ultimately was motivated to bid higher,&quot; Whitt wrote.

Verizon ultimately won the C block spectrum, while Google did not come away with any licenses. 

Just want to update this story with this new info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update</p>
<p>Just read a story today, Google in fact did bid for the  recent government spectrum auction for Wireless services, however they were simply outbid by Verizon </p>
<p>In a post on the company&#8217;s blog, Google attorney Richard Whitt wrote that, &#8220;for many days during the early course of the auction, we were the high bidder&#8221; for the so-called &#8220;C block&#8221; of spectrum.</p>
<p>That block had rules attached to it that would open it up to a broader array of devices and applications than those provided directly by the spectrum&#8217;s owner, but only if bidding reached $4.6 billion.</p>
<p>&#8220;But it was clear, then and now, that Verizon Wireless ultimately was motivated to bid higher,&#8221; Whitt wrote.</p>
<p>Verizon ultimately won the C block spectrum, while Google did not come away with any licenses. </p>
<p>Just want to update this story with this new info</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/04/02/yahoo-unveils-onesearch-20-for-mobile-phones-with-voice-search-are-mobi-in-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-2576</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 03:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/2008/04/02/yahoo-unveils-onesearch-20-for-mobile-phones-with-voice-search-are-mobi-in-trouble/#comment-2576</guid>
		<description>Steve

While your at it why don&#039;t you ask them why they are not a member of the ICA, an organization which represents domainers, which they have collected million of dollars from

Go ahead ask</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve</p>
<p>While your at it why don&#8217;t you ask them why they are not a member of the ICA, an organization which represents domainers, which they have collected million of dollars from</p>
<p>Go ahead ask</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve M</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/04/02/yahoo-unveils-onesearch-20-for-mobile-phones-with-voice-search-are-mobi-in-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-2575</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 02:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/2008/04/02/yahoo-unveils-onesearch-20-for-mobile-phones-with-voice-search-are-mobi-in-trouble/#comment-2575</guid>
		<description>Mssrs. Hedderel &amp; Brand,

Given how wonderful .mobi is, please share with Michael&#039;s readers if you would:

1. The actual number (or percentage will do) of .mobis which have been built out and are in use according to your own &quot;strict&quot; registration requirements ... is it even 10%? 5%? Less?

2. The number of .mobis you&#039;ve taken back from registrants who&#039;ve not met these &quot;strict&quot; requirements ... zero, or close to it?

3. Are you actually going to enforce these &quot;strict&quot; requirements against any registrants? If so, when ... and do you have a suitable legal fund set up if you try to do so?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mssrs. Hedderel &amp; Brand,</p>
<p>Given how wonderful .mobi is, please share with Michael&#8217;s readers if you would:</p>
<p>1. The actual number (or percentage will do) of .mobis which have been built out and are in use according to your own &#8220;strict&#8221; registration requirements &#8230; is it even 10%? 5%? Less?</p>
<p>2. The number of .mobis you&#8217;ve taken back from registrants who&#8217;ve not met these &#8220;strict&#8221; requirements &#8230; zero, or close to it?</p>
<p>3. Are you actually going to enforce these &#8220;strict&#8221; requirements against any registrants? If so, when &#8230; and do you have a suitable legal fund set up if you try to do so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Luther</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/04/02/yahoo-unveils-onesearch-20-for-mobile-phones-with-voice-search-are-mobi-in-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-2574</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Luther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 21:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/2008/04/02/yahoo-unveils-onesearch-20-for-mobile-phones-with-voice-search-are-mobi-in-trouble/#comment-2574</guid>
		<description>Regarding the premium mobi domains, I&#039;m also pretty optimistic about the future prospects for my mobi names &#039;coupons&#039; and &#039;wine&#039;, which were relatively expensive premiums.  If they are developed with compelling content, I would think the search engines will index them just like they do the dot com sites, and then they should come up for typed-in searches or verbal searches as well.  I have access to a lot of site stats packages, and I rarely see the word &#039;com&#039; used in typed-in search phrases....just like the search you suggested, you described what you were specifically looking for.....a generic term and a geo term, not a website address.

As for someone verbalizing their search, my guess is that there will still be enough people who type in a search on their cell phone keypad using Google or Yahoo or MSN or &#039;MicroYahoo&#039; search....all I need is a tiny slice of that pie to have a very good return on my investment.  I&#039;m certainly not banking on getting rich on that one mobi, it&#039;s one of many that I have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the premium mobi domains, I&#8217;m also pretty optimistic about the future prospects for my mobi names &#8216;coupons&#8217; and &#8216;wine&#8217;, which were relatively expensive premiums.  If they are developed with compelling content, I would think the search engines will index them just like they do the dot com sites, and then they should come up for typed-in searches or verbal searches as well.  I have access to a lot of site stats packages, and I rarely see the word &#8216;com&#8217; used in typed-in search phrases&#8230;.just like the search you suggested, you described what you were specifically looking for&#8230;..a generic term and a geo term, not a website address.</p>
<p>As for someone verbalizing their search, my guess is that there will still be enough people who type in a search on their cell phone keypad using Google or Yahoo or MSN or &#8216;MicroYahoo&#8217; search&#8230;.all I need is a tiny slice of that pie to have a very good return on my investment.  I&#8217;m certainly not banking on getting rich on that one mobi, it&#8217;s one of many that I have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/04/02/yahoo-unveils-onesearch-20-for-mobile-phones-with-voice-search-are-mobi-in-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-2573</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 21:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/2008/04/02/yahoo-unveils-onesearch-20-for-mobile-phones-with-voice-search-are-mobi-in-trouble/#comment-2573</guid>
		<description>Bob

Interesting.

One of the keys to the traffic growth I would think is that you developed it rather than just parked it.

My post was geared towards .mobi which have sold for 50K-200K and whether they will be a good investment long term and what voice search system yahoo is implementing will do to .mobi names.

What is you opinion on this.  

If someone can go to Yahoo.com on their cell and say &quot;pizza delivery in boca raton&quot; do you think they will do that rather than typing in a .mobi address??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob</p>
<p>Interesting.</p>
<p>One of the keys to the traffic growth I would think is that you developed it rather than just parked it.</p>
<p>My post was geared towards .mobi which have sold for 50K-200K and whether they will be a good investment long term and what voice search system yahoo is implementing will do to .mobi names.</p>
<p>What is you opinion on this.  </p>
<p>If someone can go to Yahoo.com on their cell and say &#8220;pizza delivery in boca raton&#8221; do you think they will do that rather than typing in a .mobi address??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Luther</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/04/02/yahoo-unveils-onesearch-20-for-mobile-phones-with-voice-search-are-mobi-in-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-2572</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Luther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 21:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/2008/04/02/yahoo-unveils-onesearch-20-for-mobile-phones-with-voice-search-are-mobi-in-trouble/#comment-2572</guid>
		<description>The one I was describing is not really a premium mobi domain, it is http://DeliverPizza.mobi 
I say it is not premium because the premium would be pizza itself or pizzadelivery, I would think.  This name I regged after the landrush period was over.  So at the time I guess it cost about $20 or so to register.  It cost $100 to develop it at the time and has a little database that cost less then $50.  I do have Admob ads on it at the moment, but it doesnt seem like a good program because it is not generating ads that are relevant to the content, but I am not really interested in taking the time to work on the revenue right now.  Just so the traffic keeps growing, I can spend some time figuring how best to monetize it down the road.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one I was describing is not really a premium mobi domain, it is <a href="http://DeliverPizza.mobi" rel="nofollow">http://DeliverPizza.mobi</a><br />
I say it is not premium because the premium would be pizza itself or pizzadelivery, I would think.  This name I regged after the landrush period was over.  So at the time I guess it cost about $20 or so to register.  It cost $100 to develop it at the time and has a little database that cost less then $50.  I do have Admob ads on it at the moment, but it doesnt seem like a good program because it is not generating ads that are relevant to the content, but I am not really interested in taking the time to work on the revenue right now.  Just so the traffic keeps growing, I can spend some time figuring how best to monetize it down the road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

