<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skenzo.com:  The first 4 days under Yahoo: Our results are in</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2008/03/06/skenzocom-the-first-4-days-under-yahoo-our-results-are-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/03/06/skenzocom-the-first-4-days-under-yahoo-our-results-are-in/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skenzo.com: The first 4 days under Yahoo: Our results are in &#124; Domains Yahoo</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/03/06/skenzocom-the-first-4-days-under-yahoo-our-results-are-in/comment-page-1/#comment-1661</link>
		<dc:creator>Skenzo.com: The first 4 days under Yahoo: Our results are in &#124; Domains Yahoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 19:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/2008/03/06/skenzocom-the-first-4-days-under-yahoo-our-results-are-in/#comment-1661</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/03/06/skenzocom-the-first-4-days-under-yahoo-our-results-are-in/comment-page-1/#comment-1638</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 00:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/2008/03/06/skenzocom-the-first-4-days-under-yahoo-our-results-are-in/#comment-1638</guid>
		<description>Steve

As I said we were only down 10% overall, so the 40% that did better, did well enough to make up for the 60% that went down, less 10%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve</p>
<p>As I said we were only down 10% overall, so the 40% that did better, did well enough to make up for the 60% that went down, less 10%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve M.</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/03/06/skenzocom-the-first-4-days-under-yahoo-our-results-are-in/comment-page-1/#comment-1626</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/2008/03/06/skenzocom-the-first-4-days-under-yahoo-our-results-are-in/#comment-1626</guid>
		<description>Much appreciate the info &amp; insight.

If you&#039;ve got it, what was the overall % increase you saw on the 40% of your portfolio which did better?

And what was the overall % decrease on the 60% that did worse?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much appreciate the info &amp; insight.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve got it, what was the overall % increase you saw on the 40% of your portfolio which did better?</p>
<p>And what was the overall % decrease on the 60% that did worse?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

