<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ask.com to become a Women Q &amp; A Site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2008/03/04/askcom-to-become-a-women-q-a-site/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/03/04/askcom-to-become-a-women-q-a-site/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Fulton</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/03/04/askcom-to-become-a-women-q-a-site/comment-page-1/#comment-1759</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Fulton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/2008/03/04/askcom-to-become-a-women-q-a-site/#comment-1759</guid>
		<description>This is a rumor.  

See: 
http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=3628647

According to Ask.com spokesperson Nicholas Graham, nothing could be further from the truth. &quot;The idea that we&#039;re going to become a women&#039;s site is just plain wrong.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a rumor.  </p>
<p>See:<br />
<a href="http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=3628647" rel="nofollow">http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=3628647</a></p>
<p>According to Ask.com spokesperson Nicholas Graham, nothing could be further from the truth. &#8220;The idea that we&#8217;re going to become a women&#8217;s site is just plain wrong.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve M.</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/03/04/askcom-to-become-a-women-q-a-site/comment-page-1/#comment-1600</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 01:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/2008/03/04/askcom-to-become-a-women-q-a-site/#comment-1600</guid>
		<description>Yup.

Were they to build out a new ad network (which they&#039;ve apparently already done to a fair degree anyway)/ ad platform with complete transparency for domainers, they&#039;d be buried in business ... forever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup.</p>
<p>Were they to build out a new ad network (which they&#8217;ve apparently already done to a fair degree anyway)/ ad platform with complete transparency for domainers, they&#8217;d be buried in business &#8230; forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/03/04/askcom-to-become-a-women-q-a-site/comment-page-1/#comment-1561</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 15:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/2008/03/04/askcom-to-become-a-women-q-a-site/#comment-1561</guid>
		<description>Steve

Or how about taking their business to the .EU and setting up shop there trying to capture that market like Baidu did in china.

Its a big world.

Or how about a develop their own ad network instead of using Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve</p>
<p>Or how about taking their business to the .EU and setting up shop there trying to capture that market like Baidu did in china.</p>
<p>Its a big world.</p>
<p>Or how about a develop their own ad network instead of using Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve M.</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/03/04/askcom-to-become-a-women-q-a-site/comment-page-1/#comment-1560</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 15:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/2008/03/04/askcom-to-become-a-women-q-a-site/#comment-1560</guid>
		<description>Agree that this is a mistake; and sorry to see it.

There were several things they could have done (and not done) to raise their search profile and percentage of the market; including their ineffective advertising.

There&#039;s already plenty of sites and resources--including iVillage (which has never lived up to expectations)--for woman; married and not.

Would have been better to go after a truly fast growing market like 50+ years young folks...or how about building a new ad platform specifically for monetizing domains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree that this is a mistake; and sorry to see it.</p>
<p>There were several things they could have done (and not done) to raise their search profile and percentage of the market; including their ineffective advertising.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s already plenty of sites and resources&#8211;including iVillage (which has never lived up to expectations)&#8211;for woman; married and not.</p>
<p>Would have been better to go after a truly fast growing market like 50+ years young folks&#8230;or how about building a new ad platform specifically for monetizing domains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/03/04/askcom-to-become-a-women-q-a-site/comment-page-1/#comment-1553</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 05:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/2008/03/04/askcom-to-become-a-women-q-a-site/#comment-1553</guid>
		<description>This is not a matter of our opinion, it is from a press release of ask.com.

I think it is amazing that they have moved in this direction and away from the search channel.

I do not share your enthusiasm for this move.

I thought that this was done by ivillage many years ago, and it never turned into a major portal.

If they could have made inroads through their own network and could have captured 10% of the U.S.  search market, it would have been a better move for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not a matter of our opinion, it is from a press release of ask.com.</p>
<p>I think it is amazing that they have moved in this direction and away from the search channel.</p>
<p>I do not share your enthusiasm for this move.</p>
<p>I thought that this was done by ivillage many years ago, and it never turned into a major portal.</p>
<p>If they could have made inroads through their own network and could have captured 10% of the U.S.  search market, it would have been a better move for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damir</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/03/04/askcom-to-become-a-women-q-a-site/comment-page-1/#comment-1552</link>
		<dc:creator>Damir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 04:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/2008/03/04/askcom-to-become-a-women-q-a-site/#comment-1552</guid>
		<description>If you are correct in your article Ask.com has made a very smart move.

As the population is increasing and growing that kind of service to cater to married women is in demand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are correct in your article Ask.com has made a very smart move.</p>
<p>As the population is increasing and growing that kind of service to cater to married women is in demand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

