Comments on: ICA Responds to the Anti-Phishing Consumer Protection Act of 2008 http://www.thedomains.com/2008/02/28/ica-responds-to-the-anti-phishing-consumer-protection-act-of-2008/ Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:38:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: ICA Response to APCPA | DomainBusiness http://www.thedomains.com/2008/02/28/ica-responds-to-the-anti-phishing-consumer-protection-act-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-1390 ICA Response to APCPA | DomainBusiness Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:17:53 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/2008/02/28/ica-responds-to-the-anti-phishing-consumer-protection-act-of-2008/#comment-1390 [...] Mike Berkens posted the ICA response to the proposed Anti-Phishing Consumer Protection Act of 2008. As stated above, the language in the [...] [...] Mike Berkens posted the ICA response to the proposed Anti-Phishing Consumer Protection Act of 2008. As stated above, the language in the [...]

]]> By: Damir http://www.thedomains.com/2008/02/28/ica-responds-to-the-anti-phishing-consumer-protection-act-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-1386 Damir Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:08:34 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/2008/02/28/ica-responds-to-the-anti-phishing-consumer-protection-act-of-2008/#comment-1386 Interesting post there. That is how it has been done in the past troughout history of Governments of Nations bit by bit setting laws so they can take what and when they want it from the people (in this particular part domain names) - in the name of protecting people. Tougher penalties should be set for hackers and the average internet user should get more educated why he or she should not open emails of unknown senders. Interesting post there.

That is how it has been done in the past troughout history of Governments of Nations bit by bit setting laws so they can take what and when they want it from the people (in this particular part domain names) – in the name of protecting people.

Tougher penalties should be set for hackers and the average internet user should get more educated why he or she should not open emails of unknown senders.

]]> By: TheDomains: ICA Responds to the Anti-Phishing Consumer Protection Act of 2008 - Domainly http://www.thedomains.com/2008/02/28/ica-responds-to-the-anti-phishing-consumer-protection-act-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-1384 TheDomains: ICA Responds to the Anti-Phishing Consumer Protection Act of 2008 - Domainly Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:00:39 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/2008/02/28/ica-responds-to-the-anti-phishing-consumer-protection-act-of-2008/#comment-1384 [...] Source: TheDomains.com [...] [...] Source: TheDomains.com [...]

]]> By: TheDomains: ICA Responds to the Anti-Phishing Consumer Protection Act of 2008 at Conceptualist.com, By Sahar Sarid http://www.thedomains.com/2008/02/28/ica-responds-to-the-anti-phishing-consumer-protection-act-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-1383 TheDomains: ICA Responds to the Anti-Phishing Consumer Protection Act of 2008 at Conceptualist.com, By Sahar Sarid Fri, 29 Feb 2008 04:53:29 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/2008/02/28/ica-responds-to-the-anti-phishing-consumer-protection-act-of-2008/#comment-1383 [...] Source: TheDomains.com [...] [...] Source: TheDomains.com [...]

]]> By: Elliot’s Blog » Blog Archive » ICA Response to APCPA http://www.thedomains.com/2008/02/28/ica-responds-to-the-anti-phishing-consumer-protection-act-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-1377 Elliot’s Blog » Blog Archive » ICA Response to APCPA Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:18:47 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/2008/02/28/ica-responds-to-the-anti-phishing-consumer-protection-act-of-2008/#comment-1377 [...] Mike Berkens posted the ICA response to the proposed Anti-Phishing Consumer Protection Act of 2008. As stated above, the language in the [...] [...] Mike Berkens posted the ICA response to the proposed Anti-Phishing Consumer Protection Act of 2008. As stated above, the language in the [...]

]]>