<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Domain Parking Stock Index Historical Data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2008/01/07/domain-parking-stock-index-historical-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/01/07/domain-parking-stock-index-historical-data/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:49:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JS</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/01/07/domain-parking-stock-index-historical-data/comment-page-1/#comment-9941</link>
		<dc:creator>JS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 02:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/2008/01/07/domain-parking-stock-index-historical-data/#comment-9941</guid>
		<description>Last time I will bother you with Marchex.  But today I saw the stock get crushed again and I also saw a commercial for Debt.com on TV.

So I remembered Marchex owned Debts.com, or at least they used to own Debts.com.

Looks like they sold Debts.com to Brendhan Hight (mdnhinc.com).  Are they selling their premium names?

Are you familiar with MDHC Inc.?  I see that name often when looking for names to acquire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last time I will bother you with Marchex.  But today I saw the stock get crushed again and I also saw a commercial for Debt.com on TV.</p>
<p>So I remembered Marchex owned Debts.com, or at least they used to own Debts.com.</p>
<p>Looks like they sold Debts.com to Brendhan Hight (mdnhinc.com).  Are they selling their premium names?</p>
<p>Are you familiar with MDHC Inc.?  I see that name often when looking for names to acquire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/01/07/domain-parking-stock-index-historical-data/comment-page-1/#comment-9876</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/2008/01/07/domain-parking-stock-index-historical-data/#comment-9876</guid>
		<description>JS

Also just on a financial basis hard to argue that Tucows is not a good buy with a market cap of $22M, with over 250,000 domains and a profitable registrar.

Marchex stock price is going to depend in large on the overall market.

If the market keeps tanking I expect marchex will follow.

If the market recovers substantially, I think it will go back into the $8-$9 range.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JS</p>
<p>Also just on a financial basis hard to argue that Tucows is not a good buy with a market cap of $22M, with over 250,000 domains and a profitable registrar.</p>
<p>Marchex stock price is going to depend in large on the overall market.</p>
<p>If the market keeps tanking I expect marchex will follow.</p>
<p>If the market recovers substantially, I think it will go back into the $8-$9 range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JS</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/01/07/domain-parking-stock-index-historical-data/comment-page-1/#comment-9872</link>
		<dc:creator>JS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/2008/01/07/domain-parking-stock-index-historical-data/#comment-9872</guid>
		<description>I am beginning to think investing in MCHX may be a better investment than individual names.  Obviously the market is more liquid for an equity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am beginning to think investing in MCHX may be a better investment than individual names.  Obviously the market is more liquid for an equity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/01/07/domain-parking-stock-index-historical-data/comment-page-1/#comment-9869</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/2008/01/07/domain-parking-stock-index-historical-data/#comment-9869</guid>
		<description>JS

All the public large domain holders market caps are a fraction of what the domain portfolios are worth.

Such is wall street right now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JS</p>
<p>All the public large domain holders market caps are a fraction of what the domain portfolios are worth.</p>
<p>Such is wall street right now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JS</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/01/07/domain-parking-stock-index-historical-data/comment-page-1/#comment-9868</link>
		<dc:creator>JS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 03:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/2008/01/07/domain-parking-stock-index-historical-data/#comment-9868</guid>
		<description>Have you noticed that Marchex&#039;s enterprise value is approaching the $160 million price that they paid for Ye&#039;s portfolio in 2004.  

Any thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you noticed that Marchex&#8217;s enterprise value is approaching the $160 million price that they paid for Ye&#8217;s portfolio in 2004.  </p>
<p>Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveC</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/01/07/domain-parking-stock-index-historical-data/comment-page-1/#comment-3573</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/2008/01/07/domain-parking-stock-index-historical-data/#comment-3573</guid>
		<description>Thanks for clarifying that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for clarifying that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/01/07/domain-parking-stock-index-historical-data/comment-page-1/#comment-3328</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 14:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/2008/01/07/domain-parking-stock-index-historical-data/#comment-3328</guid>
		<description>no the index is weighted to account for market cap</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no the index is weighted to account for market cap</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve C</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/01/07/domain-parking-stock-index-historical-data/comment-page-1/#comment-3319</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/2008/01/07/domain-parking-stock-index-historical-data/#comment-3319</guid>
		<description>This index is just done on raw stock prices, right? so a small cap like DBS (mkt cap as at 18th April of only approx US$40mill) can move the whole index more than movements in a behemoth like google (mkt cap US$ 160 billion)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This index is just done on raw stock prices, right? so a small cap like DBS (mkt cap as at 18th April of only approx US$40mill) can move the whole index more than movements in a behemoth like google (mkt cap US$ 160 billion)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/01/07/domain-parking-stock-index-historical-data/comment-page-1/#comment-967</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/2008/01/07/domain-parking-stock-index-historical-data/#comment-967</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the response.  

I like the idea for the index and I enjoy your blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the response.  </p>
<p>I like the idea for the index and I enjoy your blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/01/07/domain-parking-stock-index-historical-data/comment-page-1/#comment-948</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 01:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/2008/01/07/domain-parking-stock-index-historical-data/#comment-948</guid>
		<description>Jeremy

We are trying to stick with companies that make a substantial part of there revenue from domains owned by it or by monetizing them.

Cnet.com may have some great domains but that is certainly not the core business</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy</p>
<p>We are trying to stick with companies that make a substantial part of there revenue from domains owned by it or by monetizing them.</p>
<p>Cnet.com may have some great domains but that is certainly not the core business</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
